Strategic bombing first occurred during World War I when
belligerents on both sides used rigid airships and heavy aircraft to deliver
bombs on enemy targets far behind the front lines. Given the technology of the
time, air strikes were few in number, inaccurate, and had a minor military
impact. The psychological impact, however, was disproportionately large. The
reaction of the public and workforce was immediate, as evidenced by factory
absentee rates, the numbers of people fleeing cities for the countryside, and
the clamor for government action. This strong reaction was caused by the
novelty of the air weapon, not by its accuracy or destructiveness.
This belief in the psychological effects of strategic
bombing strongly affected the public, governments, and military leaders during
the interwar period. The three leading air theorists of this era—Giulio Douhet
(Italy),Hugh Trenchard (Britain), and William “Billy” Mitchell (United
States)—all assumed such a psychological impact in their projections of future
war. The irony of this belief was its implicit promise that the horrors of
strategic bombing would be so great that resorting to war would be less likely.
In short, early air theorists saw strategic bombing as a deterrent that would
keep the peace.
If deterrence failed, however, airmen hoped that strategic
bombing would offer an antidote to the trench-warfare carnage of World War I.
Strategic bombing, so the argument went, could bypass the tactical battle and
strike directly at the “vital centers” of an enemy country. Strategic bombing,
in conjunction with surface operations, would quickly bring victory. The
intended targets of the bomber offensive were the industrial, economic,
transportation, and government centers of the enemy. Note that it was the objective
that determined whether a target was strategic or tactical, not the aircraft or
weapon being used. Douhet—but not Trenchard and Mitchell—also called for direct
attack on the population in the belief that their morale would break and they
would demand an end to the war.
Strategic bombing during World War II was the sustained
aerial attack on railways, harbors, cities, workers' housing, and industrial
districts in enemy territory during World War II. Strategic bombing is a
military strategy which is distinct from both close air support of ground forces
and tactical air power.
During World War II, it was believed by many military
strategists of air power that major victories could be won by attacking
industrial and political infrastructure, rather than purely military targets.
Strategic bombing often involved bombing areas inhabited by civilians and
sometimes bombing campaigns were deliberately designed to target civilian
populations in order to terrorize, disorganize, and disrupt their usual
activities. International law at the outset of World War II did not
specifically forbid aerial bombardment of cities despite the prior occurrence
of such bombing during World War I, the Spanish Civil War, and the Second
Sino-Japanese War.
Strategic bombing during World War II began on 1 September
1939 when Germany invaded Poland and the Luftwaffe (German air force) began
bombing cities and the civilian population in Poland in an indiscriminate aerial
bombardment campaign. As the war continued to expand, bombing by both the Axis
and the Allies increased significantly. The RAF flew its first strategic
bombing raid on Germany at Mönchengladbach on 11 May 1940 and in September
1940, the Luftwaffe began targeting British cities in 'The Blitz'. From 1942
onward, the British bombing campaign against Germany became less restrictive
and increasingly targeted industrial sites and eventually, civilian areas. When
the United States began flying bombing missions against Germany, it reinforced
these efforts and controversial firebombings were carried out against Hamburg
(1943), Dresden (1945), and other German cities.
In the Pacific War, the Japanese bombed civilian populations
throughout the war (e.g. in Chongqing). The U.S. strategic bombing of the
Japanese Empire began in earnest in October 1944 and escalated into widespread
firebombing, which culminated in the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
on 6 and 9 August 1945 respectively, and the Japanese surrender on 15 August.
The effect of strategic bombing was highly debated during
and after the war. Both the Luftwaffe and RAF failed to deliver a knockout blow
by destroying enemy morale. However some argued that strategic bombing of
military targets could significantly reduce enemy industrial capacity and
production and in the opinion of its interwar period proponents, the surrender
of Japan vindicated strategic bombing.
No comments:
Post a Comment